Those who do not share the hive mind – the boys and girls
who cry "Wolf!" – are either patronised or mocked as a temporary blip
in the bubble of complacency that surrounds Winnipeg .
We've had hippies and punks, and all the other malcontents that scourged
society elsewhere, but they've all eventually grown up, got jobs, bought houses
and cabins, made families and fell into line with the rest of us. Or they left.
Either way, it's good.
So, it is generally agreed by Winnipeg 's hive mind that the Occupiers will
also fade. Until they do, we will
patronise or mock them for crying "Wolf!", smug in the knowledge that
they will, eventually, submit. They will
acquire the stuff of life and assimilate, as we did.
This is, after all, Winnipeg ,
where only the weather is extreme. The
peaks and valleys, booms and busts experienced elsewhere have no real effect here. If you're hungry or homeless, we have an app
for that; it's on you if you don't use it.
We've got Siloam Mission and the United Way and the ants dutifully spare Change
For The Better, support the CEOs for Downtown Sleepout and donate to Winnipeg
Harvest and the Christmas Cheer Board as we always have so the grasshoppers can
fiddle.
The joke, however, that people don't see is that we are not
Big Picture people at all.
The Big Picture is that our societal fringes have been fraying
for more than a generation, just like everywhere else. The market crashes and burns and burst
bubbles have rippled and eroded our banks, too, and all the smug denial of our
collective complacency will not hold indefinitely.
The Occupiers see it.
They see that lifelong careers with benefits and pensions have been
replaced by short-term contracts. They see personal savings becoming growing debt. They
see that services to the public – water, garbage, leisure activities,
education, health care – are becoming cost-driven enterprises. They see the increasing infrastructure deficit
they will inherit because we've become convinced that taxes are a burden to
society, not an investment in community.
They see the looming food shortages.
They see the rich getting richer, the poor getting poorer and the only
ones fiddling are the ones with power and security that will be inherited by a
shrinking few. The ants, deeply consumed
in their tasks, haven't noticed the grasshoppers are running the Hill.
Prime Minister Harper wasn't wrong when he said things are different in Canada ; we
didn't bail out any banks here. (See note below) However,
we are not immune to global economic effects any more than we are insulated
from the long-term effects of deregulation and the profit-driven international
agenda of major corporations that are steadily killing the beloved notion of competition keeping costs down by becoming monopolies.
It wasn't Winnipeg 's
small, stable market that attracted Veolia to our water utility. It wasn't in the interest of fair trade or
low-cost or efficiency that placed municipal procurement and the death of
"Buy Local" on CETA'S platter.
It wasn't the desire for market freedom that is killing the Canadian Wheat
Board, while other marketing boards are undisturbed. It wasn't in the name of public safety that
the gun registry is scheduled for destruction.
Tom Olsen mocked Occupy Winnipeg for having a Serious Purpose it cannot name.
Personally, I think it's more likely Occupy Winnipeg is
surprised there are any reasonably intelligent beings so comfortably entrenched that they can't see or won't admit what is swarming on the horizon of our big sky.
Raising the alarm is Occupy Winnipeg's Serious Purpose. The
Occupiers at Memorial Park are the ants who looked up and saw the grasshoppers
have become locusts.
It's been a long time, but Prairie people know what happens
when locusts swarm: They don't leave
much for the ants.
NOTE: What PM Harper said was "We obviously have a very different situation here -- we didn't bail out our banking sector." http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/10/14/occupy-canada-rallies.html
However, as Anonymous commented below, the Government of Canada didn't just sit back and allow the market to have its way with us, either:
"One of the major consequences of the collapse of the US real estate bubble in 2008 was the triggering of a significant crisis of confidence in global financial markets. In Canada, as elsewhere, the crisis made it harder for major financial institutions to secure short- and long-term financing and for Canadian consumers to obtain mortgage financing for property purchases.
"To address these temporary problems in the Canadian mortgage credit market, the federal Department of Finance announced the creation of the Insured Mortgage Purchase Program (IMPP) in October 2008. The stated purpose of the program is to "help Canadian financial institutions raise longer-term funds and make them available to consumers, home buyers and businesses in Canada." The total program envelope, initially $25 billion, was increased to $75 billion in November 2008, then to $125 billion when Budget 2009 was tabled.
"This document provides a detailed description of the IMPP's operation, from funding to the mortgage purchase mechanism. In particular, it shows how the government will be able to generate revenue from this operation and the reason why there is virtually no associated risk. Lastly, it examines the possibility that the program may not be able to achieve its stated mandate of promoting access to credit for consumers and businesses."
http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/prb0856-e.htm
Further:
Thank you, Anonymous; whoever you are!
NOTE: What PM Harper said was "We obviously have a very different situation here -- we didn't bail out our banking sector." http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/10/14/occupy-canada-rallies.html
However, as Anonymous commented below, the Government of Canada didn't just sit back and allow the market to have its way with us, either:
"One of the major consequences of the collapse of the US real estate bubble in 2008 was the triggering of a significant crisis of confidence in global financial markets. In Canada, as elsewhere, the crisis made it harder for major financial institutions to secure short- and long-term financing and for Canadian consumers to obtain mortgage financing for property purchases.
"To address these temporary problems in the Canadian mortgage credit market, the federal Department of Finance announced the creation of the Insured Mortgage Purchase Program (IMPP) in October 2008. The stated purpose of the program is to "help Canadian financial institutions raise longer-term funds and make them available to consumers, home buyers and businesses in Canada." The total program envelope, initially $25 billion, was increased to $75 billion in November 2008, then to $125 billion when Budget 2009 was tabled.
"This document provides a detailed description of the IMPP's operation, from funding to the mortgage purchase mechanism. In particular, it shows how the government will be able to generate revenue from this operation and the reason why there is virtually no associated risk. Lastly, it examines the possibility that the program may not be able to achieve its stated mandate of promoting access to credit for consumers and businesses."
http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/prb0856-e.htm
Further:
"The Honourable Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance, today announced the Government will purchase up to an additional $50 billion of insured mortgage pools by the end of the fiscal year as part of its ongoing efforts to maintain the availability of longer-term credit in Canada.
"This action will increase to $75 billion the maximum value of securities purchased through Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) under this program.
"'At a time of considerable uncertainty in global financial markets, this action will provide Canada’s financial institutions with significant and stable access to longer-term funding,' said Minister Flaherty.
"'This extension of the program to purchase insured mortgages will further support the availability of credit, which will benefit Canadian households, businesses and the economy. In addition, it will earn a modest rate of return for the Government with no additional risk to the taxpayer.'"
http://www.fin.gc.ca/n08/08-090-eng.aspThank you, Anonymous; whoever you are!